Report of the Independent Review Commission on the General Elections held in Kenya on 27th December,2007

Independent Review Commission

dc.contributor.author	Independent Review Commission
dc.date.accessioned	2021-09-10T06:07:24Z
dc.date.available	2021-09-10T06:07:24Z
dc.date.issued	2008-09-17
dc.identifier.uri	http://192.168.150.44/handle/123456789/549
dc.description	We, the members of the Independent Review Commission, appointed by you to inquire into all the aspects of the general elections held on 27 December 2007 with particular emphasis on the Presidential Election, and to report to both your good self and the Panel of Eminent African Personalities within a period of six months, hereby submit our final report to you. We shall also be submitting the report to the Chair of the Panel. The task has been carried out to the best of our abilities and in accordance with our Terms of Reference. Our report indicates our conclusions and recommendations on the various issues considered. We take this opportunity to thank Your Excellency for the trust you have shown in us. Accept, Sir, the assurances of our highest regard.	en_US
dc.description.abstract	On 30 December 2007, following announcement of the presidential election results, violence broke out in several places across Kenya amid claims that the Electoral Commission of Kenya (ECK) had rigged the presidential election. Sporadic eruptions continued for many weeks, bringing death and destruction to thousands of Kenyans. An African Union-sponsored Panel of Eminent African Personalities led by former United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan brokered a settlement which heralded a government of national unity between the main political parties and a common commitment to urgent constitutional reform. The settlement included the appointment of two commissions, one to examine the violence and the other, the Independent Review Commission (IREC), to examine the December 2007 Kenyan elections from various perspectives. In conformity with its terms of reference (ToRs) IREC now presents its findings and recommendations, based on its analysis of the legal framework for the conduct of elections in Kenya, the structure, composition and management system of the ECK and its organisation and conduct of the 2007 electoral operations. The report specifically examines the integrity of the whole electoral process, from voter registration and nomination of candidates through voting, counting, transmission and tallying to dispute resolution and post-election procedures, dedls with the role of political parties, observers, the media, civil society and the public at large, and comments on the independence, capacity and functional efficiency of the ECK. Main findings Kenya's constitutional and legal framework relating to elections contains a number of weaknesses and inconsistencies that weaken its effectiveness. This legislation needs urgent and radical revision, including consolidation. The electoral management process as a whole needs revision During the preparation and conduct of the 2007 elections the ECK lacked the necessary independence, capacity and functionality because of weaknesses in its organizational structure, composition, and management systems. The institutional legitimacy of the ECK and public confidence in the professional credibility of its commissioners and staff have been gravely and arguably irreversibly impaired. It lacks functional efficiency and is incapable of properly discharging its mandate. The conduct of the electoral process was hampered and the electoral environment was polluted by the conduct of many public participants, especially political parties and the media. There were serious defects in the voter register which impaired the integrity of the 2007 elections even before polling started: . it excluded nearly one-third of eligible voters, with a bias against women and young people . it included the names of some 1.2 million dead people Serious anomalies in the delimitation of constituencies impaired the legitimacy of the electoral process even before polling started. There was generalised abuse of polling, characterised by widespread bribery, vote buying, intimidation and ballot-stuffing. This was followed by grossly defective data collation, transmission and tallying, and ultimately the electoral process failed for lack of adequate planning, staff'- selection/training, public relations and dispute resolution. The integrity of the process and the credibility of the results were so gravely impaired by these manifold irregularities and defects that it is irrelevant whether, or not there was actual rigging at the national tally centre. The results are irretrievably polluted. Main recommendations All political role-players in Kenya should recognise that materially defective elections accompanied by public violence will remain a feature of life in their country absent a concerted and sustained commitment to "electoral integrity by all Kenyans. Radically reform the ECK, or create a new electoral management body (EMB), with a new name, image and ethos, committed to administrative excellence in the service of electoral integrity, composed of a lean policy-making and supervisory board, selected in a transparent and inclusive process, interacting with a properly structured professional secretariat. Devise, implement and maintain appropriate executive, legislative and political measures to enable the reconstituted or new EMB to initiate, popularise and sustain a national commitment to electoral integrity and respect for the inalienable franchise rights of Kenyan citizens. Empower the EMB, by means of executive, legislative and political measures properly to perform the essential functions entrusted to it under sections 42 and 42A of the Constitution (delimitation and the conduct of elections and associated activities). Adopt a new voter registration system. Agree (as part of the constitutional review process) oh an electoral system, which puts to rest the continuous discussion about a new electoral system for Kenya. Choose and implement the necessary constitutional and other legal amendments to give effect to whichever of IREC’s recommendations are accepted. Minority Opinion Two members of the Commission held a dissenting view on some o the findings reported in Chapter 6. Theil opinions are presented in italics at the end of each of the relevant paragraphs.	en_US
dc.description.sponsorship	Judge Johann Kriegler	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.subject	Independent Review Commission	en_US
dc.subject	General Elections	en_US
dc.subject	Judge Johann Kriegler	en_US
dc.title	Report of the Independent Review Commission on the General Elections held in Kenya on 27th December,2007	en_US
dc.type	Technical Report	en_US